Document Type
Original Article
Abstract
Background: Colonoscopy induces considerable discomfort and anxiety. Administration of a single anesthetic agent may result in insufficient sedation and pain relief, leading to excessive drug consumption and an escalation in unwanted side effects.
Aim: The study's objective effectiveness of the propofol-fentanyl and propofol-dexmedetomidine combinations in patients having colonoscopy .
Method: colonoscopy patients prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial conducted on 66 patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. Patients were assigned randomly into two equal groups. Group 1 received Fentanyl 1 µ/kg, combined with propofol 2 mg/kg bolus dose and 9 - 12 mg/kg/hr maintenance in the first 15 minutes, then propofol 6 - 9 mg/kg/hr for the remaining procedure. Group 2 received dexmedetomidine one µ/kg and propofol at the same regimen as group 1.
Results: Dexmedetomidine had a more speedy recovery from anesthesia than fentanyl. After 5 minutes in the PACU, all individuals in the dexmedetomidine group exhibited a modified aldrete score (MAS) of 9, while the median MAS in the fentanyl group was 7 (P=0.001). Oxygen saturation was significantly higher in dexmedetomidine than in fentanyl (97.6% vs. 94.7%). Severe bradycardia and hypotension were not reported in the two groups. No difference was reported regarding the analgesic efficacy, complications, and satisfaction. Nausea was less frequent with dexmedetomidine.
Conclusion: The combination of dexmedetomidine and propofol provided more appropriate analgesia and sedation results with a higher quality of recovery compared to fentanyl and propofol for colonoscopy.
Keywords
Colonoscopy, Dexmedetomidine, Fentanyl, Propofol, Sedation
Subject Area
Anesthesiology
How to Cite This Article
Moawad, Ayman Ahmed; El-Garhy, Ahmed Mahmoud Mohamed Mohamed; and Shamloul, Mohamed Mohamed Salah Eldin
(2024)
"Comparative Study of Fentanyl, and Dexmetomidine as an Adjuvant to Propofol for Colonoscopy,"
Al-Azhar International Medical Journal: Vol. 5:
Iss.
5, Article 57.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58675/2682-339X.2459