•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Original Article

Abstract

In obstetrics, inducing labor (IOL) is stimulating uterine contractions after the viability phase but before spontaneous labor begins, regardless of the cervix or amniotic membrane state of the pregnant woman. Our study aimed to contrast the effectiveness of the Bishop Score in predicting a successful induction of labor with that of the Manipal scoring system, which is based on sonographically identical components. One hundred primigravida (PG) pregnant women who were hospitalized to Kafr Al Sheikh Hospital for induction of labor were included in this cross-sectional study. These pregnant women underwent labor induction then we compared between Manipal Scoring System and its performance against Bishop Scoring System in predicting of successful labor. Our results revealed that by using ROC-curve analysis, Manipal Cervical scoring system can determine successful induction with accuracy of 99.9%. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV was 98.61%, 96.43%, 98.61% and 96.43% respectively (p< 0.001).Burnett modification of Bishop Score can determine successful induction with accuracy of 94.0%. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV was 77.78%, 96.43%, 98.25% and 62.79% respectively (p< 0.001). Regarding our results we can concluded that: When compared to the Bishop Score, the Manipal Cervical Scoring System is a more objective technique for predicting the success of labor induction. It's quick and painless to get, measurable and repeatable, and it gives a better indication of whether or not an intraocular lens implant will work.

Keywords

Manipal Scorimg System; Modified Bishop Score; Induction of Labor; Singleton Pregnancy.

Subject Area

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Download

Share

COinS