•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Original Article

Abstract

Background: Patients with persistent limb-threatening ischemia now have two treatment options: open surgical bypass and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stenting (PTA/S) (CLTI).Aim: for the treatment of patients with critical lower extremity ischemia, to assess the follow-up outcomes, benefits, drawbacks, complications, and patency rate of femorodistal bypass with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of the tibial arteries. Subject and Methods: On 40 patients, this comparison study will be carried out in the vascular surgery department of the Al-Azhar University Hospitals. Results: Regarding postoperative ABI, there is a substantial difference between the groups. Both groups experience a substantial postoperative rise in ABI. There is no statistically significant difference between the two study groups in terms of 30-day problems.When comparing the study groups' patency rates, the femorodistal bypass group's patency rate was much higher than the tibial arteries angioplasty group's. Conclusion: Critical Lower Limb Ischemia can be treated safely and effectively with Femorodistal Bypass Graft and Tibial Arteries Angioplasty. Between the groups, there are no discernible differences in terms of complications. When comparing the study groups' patency rates, the femorodistal bypass group's patency rate was much higher than the tibial arteries angioplasty group's.

Keywords

Femorodistal Bypass Graft, Tibial Arteries Angioplasty, Limb Ischemia.

Share

COinS