•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Original Article

Abstract

Background: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is now treated using reperfusion treatments that attempt to minimize infarct size and maximize patient prognosis. Aim of the Study: To evaluate the in-hospital and three-month outcomes of a late invasive treatment strategy vs a traditional medical therapy strategy in patients with anterior STEMI who present within 48 to 72 hours of symptom start. Materials and Methods: The current study was conducted at the cardiology department of the national heart institute and comprised 60 patients who presented to the emergency department with late anterior ST segment elevation myocardial infarction between 48 and 72 hours after symptom onset. The patients were randomly divided (closed envelop method) into two groups: Interventional Group (A): 30 patients who underwent primary PCI and medical Group (B): 30 patients treated with conventional medical therapy. Results: No significant distinction was detected between both groups regarding in-hospital MACE, ejection fraction, CKMB serial levels, MACE and ejection fraction and MPI (LAD territory) at three months follow up. Conclusion: A late invasive treatment method for patients presenting between 48- and 72-hours following symptom onset with anterior STEMI is not superior to a conventional medical treatment strategy and has similar efficacy and short-term outcomes.

Keywords

Myocardial infarction, percutaneous intervention, revascularization.

Download

Share

COinS