•  
  •  
 

Corresponding Author

Mohamed Kamel, Shehab

Document Type

systematic-review

Abstract

*Background: Estimation of the clinical effects of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), steroids, hyaluronic acid (HA), or adipose mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) injections in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). *Methods: From 2003 to 2021, researchers used Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, and other databases for randomized control trials (RCTs) with knee osteoarthritis that compared steroids, HA, adipose MSC, PRP, or in a head-to-head combination. *Results: There were a total of 24 trials in this study. Steroids are listed as the most useful intervention for pain or function management, whereas multiple PRP and adipose MSC were considered as the least likely to be effective. Despite the fact that there was no statistically significant difference in side effects between the five treatments, except for steroids, single PRP, and HA had a reduced rate of Adverse Effects than the placebo. In a pain relief, HA outperformed single PRP, but steroids outperformed single PRP by a significant margin. Furthermore, for side effects, corticosteroids were found to be superior to HA. *Conclusions: Our systematic review's ranking data, such as the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values, encourage the usage of corticosteroids and HA for suitable patients with knee osteoarthritis. Steroids, followed by HA, are most likely the best treatments for pain relief and Adverse Effects. When compared to the placebo, single PRP, multiple PRP, and adipose MSC injections don’t result in a significant reduction in joint pain or improvement in joint function.

Keywords

Knee osteoarthritis; Hyaluronic acid; Corticosteroids; Platelet Rich Plasma and Adipose Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

Download

Share

COinS