Abstract
Background: Colonoscopy induces considerable discomfort and anxiety. Administration of a single anesthetic agent may result in insufficient sedation and pain relief, leading to excessive drug consumption and an escalation in unwanted side effects.
Aim: The study's objective effectiveness of the propofol-fentanyl and propofol-dexmedetomidine combinations in patients having colonoscopy .
Method: colonoscopy patients prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial conducted on 66 patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. Patients were assigned randomly into two equal groups. Group 1 received Fentanyl 1 µ/kg, combined with propofol 2 mg/kg bolus dose and 9 - 12 mg/kg/hr maintenance in the first 15 minutes, then propofol 6 - 9 mg/kg/hr for the remaining procedure. Group 2 received dexmedetomidine one µ/kg and propofol at the same regimen as group 1.
Results: Dexmedetomidine had a more speedy recovery from anesthesia than fentanyl. After 5 minutes in the PACU, all individuals in the dexmedetomidine group exhibited a modified aldrete score (MAS) of 9, while the median MAS in the fentanyl group was 7 (P=0.001). Oxygen saturation was significantly higher in dexmedetomidine than in fentanyl (97.6% vs. 94.7%). Severe bradycardia and hypotension were not reported in the two groups. No difference was reported regarding the analgesic efficacy, complications, and satisfaction. Nausea was less frequent with dexmedetomidine.
Conclusion: The combination of dexmedetomidine and propofol provided more appropriate analgesia and sedation results with a higher quality of recovery compared to fentanyl and propofol for colonoscopy.
Article Type
Original Article
Keywords
Colonoscopy, Dexmedetomidine, Fentanyl, Propofol, Sedation
Subject Area
Anesthesiology
How to Cite This Article
Moawad, Ayman Ahmed; El-Garhy, Ahmed Mahmoud Mohamed Mohamed; and Shamloul, Mohamed Mohamed Salah Eldin
(2024)
"Comparative Study of Fentanyl, and Dexmetomidine as an Adjuvant to Propofol for Colonoscopy,"
Al-Azhar International Medical Journal: Vol. 5:
Iss.
5, Article 57.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58675/2682-339X.2459